NearQuery · NEAR hackathon, thesis track

Ask the chain. Show the work.

Is NEAR Intents becoming real cross-chain settlement, and does that create value for NEAR? Every figure below comes from public on-chain data and links to the query that produced it.

Draft verdict

Intents looks like real infrastructure, but the data shows weak value for the token so far. Captured revenue annualizes to $26.2M, 0.43% of market cap; ten times today’s volume would be 4.3%. THESIS.md has the claim, the findings, the bear case and what would change our mind.

Net swap volume
$1.30B
2026-09-29 → 2026-10-28
Implied confidential
35%
2026-09-29 → 2026-10-28
Revenue / yr
$26.2M
2026-09-29 → 2026-10-28
Buyback yield / yr
0.43%
2026-09-29 → 2026-10-28
Gas burned / yr
$118k
2026-09-29 → 2026-10-28

Daily volume, public on-chain

Open ↗

Leg-sum: both sides of every swap, the definition NEAR reports. Net swap volume is about half. Confidential Intents are not visible here.

Source · BigQuery public NEAR dataset (execution_outcomes, intents.near logs); prices from DefiLlama coins API. · 2026-01-01 → 2026-10-28

Every chart, with its query

Public events only. About 35% of reported volume does not appear in public events (implied to be Confidential Intents, but inferred, not measured), so on-chain declines can reflect migration. See METHODOLOGY.md for definitions and limits. DefiLlama’s raw series is deliberately not republished on this site.